DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> Long Exposure.....it's a Minimum!
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 211, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/12/2008 12:10:28 AM · #1
Wahooo...new challenge.

Long Exposure I - Advanced Editing
Long Exposure II - Advanced Editing
Long Exposure III - Basic Editing

Message edited by author 2008-09-12 02:42:16.
09/12/2008 12:11:16 AM · #2
Oooh, something to sink your teeth into.
09/12/2008 12:29:14 AM · #3
Sweet! inspiration awaits!
09/12/2008 12:49:20 AM · #4
excellent. Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen. Including the bug that landed on my subject in one of my challenge entries. Alright...I didn't plan that.

:)
09/12/2008 12:50:05 AM · #5
OK, I get the minimum part and I should be rejoicing, but I'm a little concerned about the long exposure - "longer than usual." Any ideas? I do use longer than usual exposures because I have IS, and when that won't do I use a tripod. Or is there some consensus that longer than say 1/60 is longer than usual?
09/12/2008 12:52:53 AM · #6
Originally posted by tnun:

OK, I get the minimum part and I should be rejoicing, but I'm a little concerned about the long exposure - "longer than usual." Any ideas? I do use longer than usual exposures because I have IS, and when that won't do I use a tripod. Or is there some consensus that longer than say 1/60 is longer than usual?


Example...night scenes turned to day.....movement blur of a runner...etc!
09/12/2008 12:58:06 AM · #7
Right. Sort of. This is going to be like the overexposure....?
09/12/2008 01:02:20 AM · #8
Originally posted by tnun:

Right. Sort of. This is going to be like the overexposure....?


not necessarily

09/12/2008 01:20:07 AM · #9
I wonder if anyone is doing a New York skyline tonight?
09/12/2008 01:20:40 AM · #10
Okay. Sort of. I didn't mean exactly like overexposure, but like it in the sense that the longer exposure is used to DO something, to make an effect you don't ordinarily get, except rarely on purpose, as in smardaz's example. So a wider set of visual wonders than in overexposure.
09/12/2008 01:43:57 AM · #11
Here are a couple of long exposures from during a wedding ceremony...just to show an extreme example, where it isn't necessary to have the long, beautiful, night beach scenes...apply this method to every day things.

Both these images were taken by my Assistant at the weddings...and there is something about them that I really like.

And what's more...apart from the Watermark....these are done in Minimal Editing rules.



09/12/2008 01:46:06 AM · #12
Originally posted by tnun:

OK, I get the minimum part and I should be rejoicing, but I'm a little concerned about the long exposure - "longer than usual." Any ideas? I do use longer than usual exposures because I have IS, and when that won't do I use a tripod. Or is there some consensus that longer than say 1/60 is longer than usual?


Exposure 101

This DPC tut on night photography
09/12/2008 01:49:59 AM · #13
Originally posted by tnun:

Okay. Sort of. I didn't mean exactly like overexposure, but like it in the sense that the longer exposure is used to DO something, to make an effect you don't ordinarily get, except rarely on purpose, as in smardaz's example. So a wider set of visual wonders than in overexposure.


Like these?




For every picture I've taken at less than 1/250th of a second, I've probably snapped 10 at longer than a second. I love to live at the slow end.
09/12/2008 02:09:25 AM · #14

09/12/2008 02:41:04 AM · #15
Thanks Langdon. :)
09/12/2008 02:42:24 AM · #16

Long Exposure I - Advanced Editing
Long Exposure II - Advanced Editing
Long Exposure III - Basic Editing
09/12/2008 02:52:02 AM · #17
Thank you all for posting the links and all the photos. Now that I have a better grasp, I would like to do some swearing, especially after looking at DrAchoo's cornucopia, and reading his comments. Haven't really tried this sort of thing much since film days - partly the limitations of my digicam, but mostly frustration with setting things up properly.

But really thank you.
09/12/2008 02:56:25 AM · #18
YES! - I was wondering when we's have a "special challenge". Minimal - a nice twist.
09/12/2008 03:15:10 AM · #19
Didn't I see a special rules flag that said the good Doc couldn't enter this one? :)
09/12/2008 03:35:21 AM · #20
thank you guys/gals for the tips i,m sure i can pull something out of the hat/camera?
09/12/2008 06:11:12 AM · #21
This is great! Now I just have to find my tripod...

I hope everyone looks at the editing rules carefully...No crop, no fancy sharpen, etc. As I recall, these editing rules even tripped up a certain site council individual with a load of ribbons...
09/12/2008 06:53:43 AM · #22
And no RAW files allowed! Only JPEG!
09/12/2008 06:59:54 AM · #23
my teacher has me in training for this one lucky i have a d70 with bulb ner ner ner!!!
09/12/2008 07:01:23 AM · #24
Originally posted by toddster45:

my teacher has me in training for this one lucky i have a d70 with bulb ner ner ner!!!


I hope you don't let your teacher down!
09/12/2008 07:03:24 AM · #25
I was reading the minimal editing rules and it says you can sharpen but not with USM. Is smart sharpen allowed?
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 11:21:27 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 11:21:27 AM EDT.