Author | Thread |
|
12/30/2007 02:22:05 PM · #1 |
Compact Flash or xD, which is a better card to use and why?
My camera takes both and currently has a CF card in it. I believe the xD cards are a bit cheaper and wanted to find out some more before I get more memory.
Thanks :) |
|
|
12/30/2007 02:29:12 PM · #2 |
I think CF is cheaper and comes in higher capacity. |
|
|
12/30/2007 02:52:49 PM · #3 |
XD cards max out at 2GB. CF cards are available up to 16GB, run faster, and cost about 1/3 the price of XD. Most external card readers don't support XD either. |
|
|
12/30/2007 03:02:41 PM · #4 |
My computer's reader lists xD, but there is difinitely not a place for CF cards and when transferring from camera to computer it takes forever... it must be the old USB 1 or something. That was part of my reasoning for looking at the xD, to speed up the transfer process. Maybe I'll look for a speedy card reader instead.
Thanks for the input. |
|
|
12/30/2007 03:10:36 PM · #5 |
I was just checking out the max CF card for my camera and it tops out at 8 GB but I found this too...
"What type of USB connection is used?
The EVOLT E-500 is USB Auto-Connect (mass storage) and is compliant with USB 2.0 Full-Speed specifications."
Hmmm... It sure doesn't act like it and that was one of the complaints when reading reviews. |
|
|
12/30/2007 03:20:09 PM · #6 |
FWIW, even if the camera's connection is 2.0 compliant, it's going to be slower than a reader.
|
|
|
12/30/2007 03:22:40 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by secretagent65: The EVOLT E-500 is USB Auto-Connect (mass storage) and is compliant with USB 2.0 Full-Speed specifications." |
That's marketing-speak. "USB 2.0 Full-Speed" = USB 1.1 (slow). The *real* USB 2.0 interface is called "USB 2.0 Hi-Speed." From the USB developers' site: "Avoid using terminology such as USB 2.0 Full Speed, Full Speed USB or USB 2.0 which can be confusing for consumers whose expectation is that a USB 2.0 product is by definition high-speed." If you really want fast downloads, use a CF card and Firewire card reader.
Message edited by author 2007-12-30 15:24:21. |
|
|
12/30/2007 03:26:33 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by secretagent65: The EVOLT E-500 is USB Auto-Connect (mass storage) and is compliant with USB 2.0 Full-Speed specifications." |
That's marketing-speak. "USB 2.0 Full-Speed" = USB 1.1 (slow). The *real* USB 2.0 interface is called "USB 2.0 Hi-Speed." From the USB developers' site: "Avoid using terminology such as USB 2.0 Full Speed, Full Speed USB or USB 2.0 which can be confusing for consumers whose expectation is that a USB 2.0 product is by definition high-speed." If you really want fast downloads, use a CF card and Firewire card reader. |
@scalvert: you probably mean Firewire 800. From my recent tests FW400 was about the same as USB2.0 Hi-speed. At least for external hard drives. |
|
|
12/30/2007 03:39:24 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Nikolai1024: @scalvert: you probably mean Firewire 800. From my recent tests FW400 was about the same as USB2.0 Hi-speed. At least for external hard drives. |
The FW800 interface is indeed the fastest card reader available, but even a Lexar FW400 reader (I own both) will outperform most USB 2.0 readers. |
|
|
12/30/2007 09:30:31 PM · #10 |
Thanks for all the great info... now how do I find out if my firewire port is 800 or 400? I'm checking in the device manager and is says - RICOH OHCI Compliant IEEE 1394 Host Controller. |
|
|
12/30/2007 09:33:28 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by secretagent65: Thanks for all the great info... now how do I find out if my firewire port is 800 or 400? I'm checking in the device manager and is says - RICOH OHCI Compliant IEEE 1394 Host Controller. |
|
|
|
12/30/2007 09:51:31 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by Nikolai1024:
|
That's obviously some sort of external device... what I was wondering though was how to tell on one's computer, not the external device. My device manager wasn't too specific and probably has a generic driver for my firewire port. I'll check the HP website and look up the specs for my computer. :) |
|
|
12/30/2007 09:53:05 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by scalvert: Originally posted by Nikolai1024: @scalvert: you probably mean Firewire 800. From my recent tests FW400 was about the same as USB2.0 Hi-speed. At least for external hard drives. |
The FW800 interface is indeed the fastest card reader available, but even a Lexar FW400 reader (I own both) will outperform most USB 2.0 readers. |
I have a USB 2.0 Hi Speed reader (actually several of them) and can read a full 4Gb off the card in about 20 minutes. (back when I was using 1Gb cards and it was reading the full 1Gb in 5 minutes, it seemed "fast", now it feels like it takes forever)
I also have two Firewire readers (400 only) and they read the same 4Gb card in about 4 minutes. That's 1/5th the amount of time. I much prefer Firewire.
As for external hard drives ... the speeds seem "similar" though I generally feel prefer the speed of my firewire drives over my USB 2.0 drives but the difference is not nearly so obvious.
Message edited by author 2007-12-30 22:11:52.
|
|
|
12/30/2007 10:09:52 PM · #14 |
the xD in the olympus allows you to shoot in panorama mode... the cf's don't. |
|
|
12/30/2007 11:43:39 PM · #15 |
Wow. I didn't know anyone was still using xD cards. I have an Olympus C740 and never used it anymore, but I loathe those blasted xD cards. So bloody proprietary. It was hard getting a card reader that reads them although I think I now have two that do. |
|
|
12/30/2007 11:51:14 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by secretagent65: That's obviously some sort of external device... what I was wondering though was how to tell on one's computer, not the external device. |
It's almost certainly FW400. Very few PCs have FW800 built-in. If you look (closely) at the image Nikolai posted, you'll see that the connectors are different. FW400 is a relatively narrow connector, squared on one side and rounded on the other. FW800 is squared all around, with a couple of ridges on one side. |
|
|
12/31/2007 02:33:29 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by annasense: the xD in the olympus allows you to shoot in panorama mode... the cf's don't. |
Hmmm... then I may have to get one small one ( 1 GB) just for that. Thanks :) |
|
|
12/31/2007 02:35:39 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by scalvert: It's almost certainly FW400. Very few PCs have FW800 built-in. If you look (closely) at the image Nikolai posted, you'll see that the connectors are different. FW400 is a relatively narrow connector, squared on one side and rounded on the other. FW800 is squared all around, with a couple of ridges on one side. |
The pic is a little small for me to notice the difference. However, I do know that my computer has the old style port going in. Thanks for the tip. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 03/28/2024 05:21:52 PM EDT.