| Author | Thread |
|
|
11/25/2016 07:07:14 AM · #26 |
|
|
|
11/25/2016 07:13:55 AM · #27 |
Originally posted by riot:
Originally posted by MeMex2:
Gipper, your average vote cast is 4.7. We will be happy to loose the negativity! |
MeMex2, your average vote received is 5.6. We would be happy to lose your garbage input. |
Have reported this post to the council!
Message edited by author 2016-11-25 07:14:04. |
|
|
|
11/25/2016 11:15:39 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by riot:
Originally posted by MeMex2:
Gipper, your average vote cast is 4.7. We will be happy to loose the negativity! |
MeMex2, your average vote received is 5.6. We would be happy to lose your garbage input. |
Good grief, really.
I just checked mine and after some 240,236 votes cast and an average vote of 5.7960 I am starting to feel like mine is also a "garbage input".
Perhaps it would be best for me to hand in my papers also. :O(
Ray
Message edited by author 2016-11-25 11:17:41. |
|
|
|
11/25/2016 11:47:56 AM · #29 |
Originally posted by riot:
Originally posted by MeMex2:
Gipper, your average vote cast is 4.7. We will be happy to loose the negativity! |
MeMex2, your average vote received is 5.6. We would be happy to lose your garbage input. |
Seriously? Are we not able to have a disagreement or even a decent discussion without name-calling? Eugene, lighten up. You too, Gipper.
Everyone's input is valuable here. |
|
|
|
11/25/2016 01:00:41 PM · #30 |
| Heh! I meet the garbage standard - my vote given too high, my vote received no better. And yet I just entered another garbage shot in a challenge. Go figure! :-) |
|
|
|
11/25/2016 01:37:15 PM · #31 |
Sorry to have hit a nerve Eugene. Your average vote cast is 3.8.
Your stats are exemplary. If only we had more people with your dedication, sense of fairness and ethics. |
|
|
|
11/25/2016 01:47:48 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by tanguera:
Originally posted by riot:
Originally posted by MeMex2:
Gipper, your average vote cast is 4.7. We will be happy to loose the negativity! |
MeMex2, your average vote received is 5.6. We would be happy to lose your garbage input. |
Seriously? Are we not able to have a disagreement or even a decent discussion without name-calling? Eugene, lighten up. You too, Gipper.
Everyone's input is valuable here. |
Didn't you forget to mention someone, or is that member one of the controlling members?
|
|
|
|
11/25/2016 02:01:49 PM · #33 |
| Everyone lighten up. Seriously. This is becoming a personal attack thread and I will lock it up. Nothing good comes of this. |
|
|
|
11/26/2016 03:00:50 AM · #34 |
| I don't know if my work qualifies as garbage, but I'm pretty sure I qualify as white trash |
|
|
|
11/26/2016 02:19:51 PM · #35 |
| I think more open challenges would be good for the site. For me it has become obvious that popularity has become a decisive factor for the top scoring images, this is an inevitable consequence of having so few entries. On every challenge I now give an average score of under five and the top images are way over scored compared with equivalent images from a few years ago, this is really downgrading for the site and will end in its destruction. I know that the friendship side of this site is considered as being massively important but it shouldn't overshadow the real value of what is shown here, it certainly does now. I was once proud to be in the TT, now the only real achievement here is to be awarded some PH bling and the better photos are either on the last page or they get no comments and finish with a 5.2, opening things up to knew participants can only be a good thing. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 07:06:10 PM EDT.
