| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/06/2012 05:41:14 PM · #176 |
Originally posted by JH:
Nice to see the thread all quietened down now. Everyone back in their boxes.
Langdon can breath a sigh of relief - The rebellion has been extinguished in its infancy. |
Most of the SC are conspicuous by their absence - especially the ones who seem to have an opinion on everything - even though Langdon not around, they are worried they will upset things by not toeing the company line. They all wind their heads in on these threads.
"please make them go away, please make them go away"
|
|
|
|
09/06/2012 06:17:18 PM · #177 |
Originally posted by Simms:
Most of the SC are conspicuous by their absence - especially the ones who seem to have an opinion on everything - even though Langdon not around, they are worried they will upset things by not toeing the company line. They all wind their heads in on these threads.
"please make them go away, please make them go away" |
You know what, that's both unfair and unnecessarily inflammatory. You really don't have a clue how any of the SC feel except what they have publicly posted, which has been uniformly positive on the matter of additions to the SC. As for "toeing the company line," you expect what, a public display of discord? The SC is entrusted to manage a lot of the day-to-day site operation, and as a management *team* they need to abide by the site rules and to present, as much as possible, a unified face to the community. So unless they are clearly stating that they are posting their personal opinion, their posts will reflect the *team* consensus. |
|
|
|
09/06/2012 06:24:29 PM · #178 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
Originally posted by Simms:
Most of the SC are conspicuous by their absence - especially the ones who seem to have an opinion on everything - even though Langdon not around, they are worried they will upset things by not toeing the company line. They all wind their heads in on these threads.
"please make them go away, please make them go away" |
You know what, that's both unfair and unnecessarily inflammatory. You really don't have a clue how any of the SC feel except what they have publicly posted, which has been uniformly positive on the matter of additions to the SC. As for "toeing the company line," you expect what, a public display of discord? The SC is entrusted to manage a lot of the day-to-day site operation, and as a management *team* they need to abide by the site rules and to present, as much as possible, a unified face to the community. So unless they are clearly stating that they are posting their personal opinion, their posts will reflect the *team* consensus. |
+1 |
|
|
|
09/06/2012 06:30:46 PM · #179 |
Originally posted by Simms:
Originally posted by JH:
Nice to see the thread all quietened down now. Everyone back in their boxes.
Langdon can breath a sigh of relief - The rebellion has been extinguished in its infancy. |
Most of the SC are conspicuous by their absence - especially the ones who seem to have an opinion on everything - even though Langdon not around, they are worried they will upset things by not toeing the company line. They all wind their heads in on these threads.
"please make them go away, please make them go away" |
I somehow doubt very much that they are overly concerned about this thread.
I seem to recall that we went through this very exercise a few year ago and that  Bear_Music was the hands down favorite back then also and what happened you ask... well they added/filled slots with new people, some of whom I had never heard of.
I do wish Robert the best of luck and know that his addition would be a definite plus to this site, but until management enters the fray, this is almost an exercise in futility.
Ray |
|
|
|
09/06/2012 06:37:00 PM · #180 |
Originally posted by Simms:
[
Most of the SC are conspicuous by their absence - especially the ones who seem to have an opinion on everything - even though Langdon not around, they are worried they will upset things by not toeing the company line. They all wind their heads in on these threads. |
Reminds me of a time way back when, when I was bitching about the management and a superior told me: "When you are working your way UP the ladder, you tend to notice the a$$holes a lot more"
:O)
Ray |
|
|
|
09/06/2012 06:52:27 PM · #181 |
Originally posted by kirbic:
Originally posted by Simms:
Most of the SC are conspicuous by their absence - especially the ones who seem to have an opinion on everything - even though Langdon not around, they are worried they will upset things by not toeing the company line. They all wind their heads in on these threads.
"please make them go away, please make them go away" |
You know what, that's both unfair and unnecessarily inflammatory. You really don't have a clue how any of the SC feel except what they have publicly posted, which has been uniformly positive on the matter of additions to the SC. As for "toeing the company line," you expect what, a public display of discord? The SC is entrusted to manage a lot of the day-to-day site operation, and as a management *team* they need to abide by the site rules and to present, as much as possible, a unified face to the community. So unless they are clearly stating that they are posting their personal opinion, their posts will reflect the *team* consensus. |
Not trying to blow things up any more, just stating a fact - you can go into any number of threads on here and the usual bunch are always posting - but these threads turn up from time to time and they literally fall silent - which is why I was so surprised, and pleased, when Frisca actually stuck her head above the parapet - which means she must REALLY be narked & exasperated about Langdons lack of interest in the site at the moment - that was so out of character for an SC in a thread such as this that. A new found respect for her in this situation. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 01:22:23 AM · #182 |
bump
@ Langdon: We would like some more / new SC please.
Message edited by author 2012-09-07 01:22:34. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 08:12:19 AM · #183 |
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by slickchik:
..
and how about MattO |
No better than me... I wouldn't advocate for either of us... We're too straight forward in all truthfulness. |
I applied and offered my services last time they added SC. I was told I wasn't a good fit. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 09:22:42 AM · #184 |
| we had the Arab spring this year - now we have the dpc autumn |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 10:44:15 AM · #185 |
| Robert, yes! Melethia, no. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 11:31:46 AM · #186 |
Originally posted by Melethia:
Robert, yes! Melethia, no. |
Totally agree. ;) |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 11:44:34 AM · #187 |
| simms, judi, bear. now who should they replace? |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 11:47:10 AM · #188 |
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:
simms, judi, bear. now who should they replace? |
GeneralE, Frisca, and Scalvert. ;P |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 11:51:30 AM · #189 |
Originally posted by MattO:
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by slickchik:
..
and how about MattO |
No better than me... I wouldn't advocate for either of us... We're too straight forward in all truthfulness. |
I applied and offered my services last time they added SC. I was told I wasn't a good fit. |
That may have been during your chain saw phase during which everyone was a bit leary......
Edit to manually correct my phones auto correction of what was correct before it stepped in to mess with me!
Message edited by author 2012-09-07 11:54:23. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 12:03:24 PM · #190 |
Originally posted by PapaBob:
Originally posted by MattO:
Originally posted by Cory:
Originally posted by slickchik:
..
and how about MattO |
No better than me... I wouldn't advocate for either of us... We're too straight forward in all truthfulness. |
I applied and offered my services last time they added SC. I was told I wasn't a good fit. |
That may have been during your chain saw phase during which everyone was a bit leary...... |
Naw, the chainsaw phase was  Strikeslip :-) |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 12:17:17 PM · #191 |
Speaking of which, I nominate Strikeslip to replace  langdon |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 12:32:50 PM · #192 |
VOTE Strikeslip FOR SUPREME RULER !
|
|
|
|
09/07/2012 12:33:17 PM · #193 |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 01:20:10 PM · #194 |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 01:53:13 PM · #195 |
I support that...pending a full report by the Squirrel Rights Commission of the UN, clearing Slippy of any wrongdoing in the "squirrel relocation" incident. |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 02:00:20 PM · #196 |
| Why are people asking for certain SC members to be replaced? It seems like it's being supported by several people. Did I miss something? Did they sacrificed a cat or something? |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 02:02:13 PM · #197 |
Originally posted by yanko:
Why are people asking for certain SC members to be replaced? It seems like it's being supported by several people. Did I miss something? Did they sacrificed a cat or something? |
The ones in this thread posted above are jokes.
The ones they want replaced are those that are inactive and not helping leaving the current SC too overloaded to accomplish anything in some sort of timely manner.
Matt |
|
|
|
09/07/2012 02:09:46 PM · #198 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip:
OR ELSE ! |
Here, let me write a little code to assess this scenario:
If (Slippy,Supreme_Ruler) = TRUE then Disaster = Impending Else Status = Quo
Hmmm, looks ominous! ;-)
Message edited by author 2012-09-07 14:09:53.
|
|
|
|
09/07/2012 02:18:35 PM · #199 |
heh same ole DPC, I suppose I shouldn't be the least surprised.
Anyway +1 in support of Bear, and more hats!
|
|
|
|
09/07/2012 06:33:06 PM · #200 |
Originally posted by AlexSaberi:
simms, judi, bear. now who should they replace? |
Ouch!!
You're a bad man.. I like bad men. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 09:16:24 PM EDT.
