DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> astrophotography
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 12 of 12, (reverse)
AuthorThread
05/25/2012 11:32:33 PM · #1
how too shoot like this?

step by step would help :)

thanks!
05/26/2012 12:24:03 PM · #2
First, find a *really* dark location with clear skies. The location of that photo is about 250km NE of Melbourne Australia. Great location for that kind of work.
Next, spend about a year practicing and refining your technique. Getting that kind of exposure on the sky requires very long exposures, measured in minutes. Ideally several of those exposures, stacked. Plus dark frames for NR; these must be stacked and properly combined for best effect. All done on a "tracking mount" set to precisely track the sky during exposure.
The foreground requires separate shots while *not* tracking, and the sky and foreground must be combined in post. You can see trailing at the lower left, this is leftover from the foreground exposure(s).
If this all sounds like a lot of learning, it very much is. That's the bad news. The good news is it is a very rewarding learning curve.
05/26/2012 12:38:19 PM · #3
I think people are now using multiple shorter exposures and combining them for this kind of sky, rather than one long one.
05/26/2012 12:42:59 PM · #4
Check out Pascal's fabulous collection. Breathtaking! He posted details on some of the images.
Few of my favorites:
05/26/2012 01:25:26 PM · #5
Originally posted by cloudsme:

I think people are now using multiple shorter exposures and combining them for this kind of sky, rather than one long one.


You are correct, stacking has been the accepted technique for digital, and it won't change any time soon. But the exposures are still a minute or more for that kind of sky illumination, even at higher ISOs. Even for wide angle shots, tracking is a requirement.
05/26/2012 01:29:43 PM · #6
Originally posted by cloudsme:

I think people are now using multiple shorter exposures and combining them for this kind of sky, rather than one long one.

Registax is software specifically designed for this.
05/26/2012 06:32:02 PM · #7
Kirbic is right, must have tracking for at least an exposure of a few minutes. The basic technique is to shoot an exposure for the sky, with tracking on, and then a separate exposure for the foreground (terrestrial) objects, with tracking off. Then a few hours in photoshop to seamlessly merge the two images:

Link.
05/26/2012 06:40:23 PM · #8
Originally posted by strangeghost:

Kirbic is right, must have tracking for at least an exposure of a few minutes. The basic technique is to shoot an exposure for the sky, with tracking on, and then a separate exposure for the foreground (terrestrial) objects, with tracking off. Then a few hours in photoshop to seamlessly merge the two images:

Link.


"Forbidden" link...
05/26/2012 09:26:21 PM · #9
Originally posted by kirbic:

Originally posted by cloudsme:

I think people are now using multiple shorter exposures and combining them for this kind of sky, rather than one long one.


You are correct, stacking has been the accepted technique for digital, and it won't change any time soon. But the exposures are still a minute or more for that kind of sky illumination, even at higher ISOs. Even for wide angle shots, tracking is a requirement.


I dunno. Here's a link to a 30 second, ISO 3200, no tracking, single exposure shot from Bryce Canyon. It's not quite as bright, but that might be partly post processing.

Bryce Canyon Milky Way
05/26/2012 09:41:46 PM · #10
Here is an example of a "quick" shot. Its not spectacular. Didn't take a dark frame, rough altazimuth alignment, 2 images, 30 seconds each poorly stacked. Light pollution present.

Yet, you see things you don't with the naked eye. I agree with other posters, practice. Start with things as bad as the one below, learn from it. Just wish I had more time. :)

05/26/2012 10:36:39 PM · #11
woww! This is really a good discussion and outcome!

Thanks guys!
05/26/2012 10:59:39 PM · #12
Originally posted by strangeghost:

Kirbic is right, must have tracking for at least an exposure of a few minutes. The basic technique is to shoot an exposure for the sky, with tracking on, and then a separate exposure for the foreground (terrestrial) objects, with tracking off. Then a few hours in photoshop to seamlessly merge the two images:

Link.


Out of practice for the forums:

link
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 01:03:56 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/19/2024 01:03:56 AM EDT.