| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/13/2010 03:42:41 PM · #126 |
Originally posted by JustCaree:
Originally posted by kenskid:
I got the grill fired up. I'll have grilled lens cap with a side of UV filter when validations come out.
Originally posted by PapaBob:
Originally posted by kenskid:
If this was taken during the month of June and is validated, I'll eat my lens cap. |
The photo is still on the front page, looks like it may have made it validation, would you like some ketchup on your cap...:P |
|
Dont forget the picture!! Cause I do believe this one is going to be validated! |
I have my doubts... In look at the other images shown on his site. There is one that's pretty much the same exact pose, with the veil draped almost exactly the same. But if you look at the texture of the veil, the grain runs vertically in one shot and horizontally in the other.
shot 1 shot 2
I'm really hoping that it's just the sharpening that did that, however. Because it's beautiful and deserves 1st.
Message edited by author 2010-07-13 15:43:44.
|
|
|
|
07/13/2010 03:57:59 PM · #127 |
| IF it gets DQ'd, it will be highly disappointing for David who will be denied showing up on the front page for a Free Study which is still a particular honor on this site. It used to be that validations occurred much faster. |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 03:59:28 PM · #128 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
IF it gets DQ'd, it will be highly disappointing for David who will be denied showing up on the front page for a Free Study which is still a particular honor on this site. It used to be that validations occurred much faster. |
Doc is bashing the SC! GET HIM!!! |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 04:02:47 PM · #129 |
"And if appointed to SC, I promise to single-handedly (or is that unilaterally?) validate (or invalidate, as the case may be) every image within 30 minutes of its original being submitted."
(Offer valid only within the hours of 8AM to Midnight, DPC time)
:-)
R. |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 04:47:05 PM · #130 |
| So the photo has been nondisqualificationalized? |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 05:10:24 PM · #131 |
Originally posted by bvy:
So the photo has been nondisqualificationalized? |
lol you've been using a new dictionary lately. i need a copy :D |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 05:18:24 PM · #132 |
Originally posted by bvy:
nondisqualificationalized? |
help me, Google translation does not know this word... do you have to think also at the italian people! ;-))
|
|
|
|
07/13/2010 05:21:08 PM · #133 |
Originally posted by GiorgioBaruffi:
Originally posted by bvy:
nondisqualificationalized? |
help me, Google translation does not know this word... do you have to think also at the italian people! ;-)) |
nondisqualificationalized means not disqualified.....just said in a fancy way.
|
|
|
|
07/13/2010 05:25:14 PM · #134 |
| Nothing fancy about it, just ridiculized. |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 05:28:14 PM · #135 |
Originally posted by tnun:
Nothing fancy about it, just ridiculized. |
I need a copy of your dictionary too :) |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 06:22:41 PM · #136 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
"And if appointed to SC, I promise to single-handedly (or is that unilaterally?) validate (or invalidate, as the case may be) every image within 30 minutes of its original being submitted."
(Offer valid only within the hours of 8AM to Midnight, DPC time)
:-)
R. |
Where do I donate to your campaign? |
|
|
|
07/13/2010 07:34:45 PM · #137 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music:
"And if appointed to SC, I promise to single-handedly (or is that unilaterally?) validate (or invalidate, as the case may be) every image within 30 minutes of its original being submitted."
(Offer valid only within the hours of 8AM to Midnight, DPC time)
:-)
R. |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
Where do I donate to your campaign? |
Can we do a write-in vote for SC???
|
|
|
|
07/14/2010 09:36:18 AM · #138 |
Is this over yet? Is there a way to get that texture on the photo without adding a texture? If there is, I hope the photographer shares his secrets.
The only way I can see this being a legit photo is if all his other ones that don't show the texture had the texture "erased" and left it on his DPC entry. (This is a real possibility)
Has any of the others been validated?
Lens cap soup is on hold for now. |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 09:38:55 AM · #139 |
Originally posted by kenskid:
Is this over yet? Is there a way to get that texture on the photo without adding a texture? If there is, I hope the photographer shares his secrets.
The only way I can see this being a legit photo is if all his other ones that don't show the texture had the texture "erased" and left it on his DPC entry. (This is a real possibility)
Has any of the others been validated?
Lens cap soup is on hold for now. |
I was going to ask for the recipe for lens cap soup, but I can't find my spare caps, so I guess you can skip sending it.
|
|
|
|
07/14/2010 09:47:13 AM · #140 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by GiorgioBaruffi:
Originally posted by bvy:
nondisqualificationalized? |
help me, Google translation does not know this word... do you have to think also at the italian people! ;-)) |
nondisqualificationalized means not disqualified.....just said in a fancy way. |
I love your made up words. You need to share with the world! pseudodictionary.com/ |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 09:53:24 AM · #141 |
Originally posted by kenskid:
Is this over yet? Is there a way to get that texture on the photo without adding a texture? If there is, I hope the photographer shares his secrets.
The only way I can see this being a legit photo is if all his other ones that don't show the texture had the texture "erased" and left it on his DPC entry. (This is a real possibility)
Has any of the others been validated?
Lens cap soup is on hold for now. |
When I look at the ones without texture they look more like the texture may have been there but was selectively blurred, but without looking at the original it is hard to say.
I would think the decision should have been made by now so it may be time to bust a cap in your gut.....lol
Message edited by author 2010-07-14 09:53:34. |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 09:54:37 AM · #142 |
Originally posted by kenskid:
Is this over yet? Is there a way to get that texture on the photo without adding a texture? If there is, I hope the photographer shares his secrets.
|
Shoot through a very fine piece of net fabric? |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 10:25:24 AM · #143 |
That's some magic fabric. It knows not to show the texture on the face. I guess he could have "erased" it over the face but that would be a DQ also.
Originally posted by SaraR:
Originally posted by kenskid:
Is this over yet? Is there a way to get that texture on the photo without adding a texture? If there is, I hope the photographer shares his secrets.
|
Shoot through a very fine piece of net fabric? |
|
|
|
|
07/14/2010 02:27:31 PM · #144 |
I don't know if anybody doubts it is an overlay, but if someone needs proof you can see it by looking at a highly sharpened version. Note the overlay travels in perfect lines across the muslin, skin, and background material on the right and then jumps onto her skin on the left.
It seems like an open and shut case, but I wonder if the debate is whether this qualifies as added "noise" which has been allowed. I think this may be a possible reason for the delayed ruling. If it isn't, and this gets DQ'd I would think Langdon needs to take a serious look at the current timeframe for DQs like this.
Message edited by author 2010-07-14 14:28:12. |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 02:39:09 PM · #145 |
I don't like drama and that's why I constantly avoid having to validated my work by staying out of the top 5 on a ritually constant basis. Hell I'm usually so careful I make sure to stay out of the top 50 in most cases.
|
|
|
|
07/14/2010 03:02:45 PM · #146 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
I don't know if anybody doubts it is an overlay, but if someone needs proof you can see it by looking at a highly sharpened version. Note the overlay travels in perfect lines across the muslin, skin, and background material on the right and then jumps onto her skin on the left.
|
Don't forget the bridge of her nose.
Tim |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 03:04:12 PM · #147 |
Originally posted by SEG:
I don't like drama and that's why I constantly avoid having to validated my work by staying out of the top 5 on a ritually constant basis. Hell I'm usually so careful I make sure to stay out of the top 50 in most cases. |
Thats a crazy good strategy. |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 03:22:32 PM · #148 |
Originally posted by SEG:
I don't like drama and that's why I constantly avoid having to validated my work by staying out of the top 5 on a ritually constant basis. Hell I'm usually so careful I make sure to stay out of the top 50 in most cases. |
Originally posted by mgarsteck:
Thats a crazy good strategy. |
One o' them, anyway......dunno 'bout good! LOL!!!
|
|
|
|
07/14/2010 03:57:05 PM · #149 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
I don't know if anybody doubts it is an overlay, but if someone needs proof you can see it by looking at a highly sharpened version. Note the overlay travels in perfect lines across the muslin, skin, and background material on the right and then jumps onto her skin on the left. |
I wanted to give the benefit of doubt since I had not seen the original but the over sharp version really does show a texture and I have to admit it looks like it should not be legal. |
|
|
|
07/14/2010 03:59:53 PM · #150 |
heheh, the SC aren't validating it yet, because it's already being validated here. They can just wait for the results to be determined in this thread. :D
Message edited by author 2010-07-14 16:00:03.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/18/2024 03:53:22 PM EDT.
