Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by anireno:
i´d like to see more dpof

Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by BrennanOB:
The backround in this shot dosen't help your cause, the potted plant and kitchen entry tend to distract

Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by Kjetil Hansen:
DOF is bad and the background is disturbing.

Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by Count:
Cool idea, but I don't know if plastic players count as "players" if not then great photo, if so then I think your score may suffer. I like it though....

Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by KiwiChris:
Arn't these guys 'players' in a sense? Cor, this argument could go on forever... :-)

Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by Maverick:
I thought about doing this at the last minute, wasn't happy with my results though. I like how you accomplished this. I think with a black backdrop (posterboard would work), the background could be made a little less prevalent. Also, maybe including the puck on the players stick would give a better sense of action. Finally, (this coming from a Penguins fan), the Flyer's uniform contrasts greatly with the title = ) (Go Tampa!) btw, nice work.

Stanley Cup Playoffs
by rogerspaul

Comment by hgpayne:
Hmmm.... meets the challenge... doesn't meet the challenge... that's the debate in my head. On the one hand, these ARE the players in this game, if it is viewed as a team event, thus it doesn't meet the challenge. On the other hand, this is a mechanical game where the real players manipulate the controls, which drive these players -- HOWEVER, the real players that manipulate these players are individuals -- 2 people pitted against each other -- clearly not a team sport. Hey, I talked myself into a "does not meet the challenge." Do you see why I think this?

Checkers anyone?
by rogerspaul

Comment by TooCool:
Interesting POV... Did ya try turning it over (180 degrees)?
TC
PS: what is the sign supposed to say?

Checkers anyone?
by rogerspaul

Comment by LoudDog:
Might do better rotated 180 degrees.

Checkers anyone?
by rogerspaul

Comment by 37va:
Great angle. 5