QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by blondmcfly:
It's not personification if the stone was carved to look like a person.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by sacs:
ahh! this statue looks evil! i love how the fingers are chopped off. it gives it more of an attitude. but great job! and nice pic.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by DrAchoo:
Statues and figurines did not meet the challenge in my opinion.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by HVGB_photos:
Sorry, I see this sculpture as being a personification by the sculptor, not the photographer. Nice symbolism in the missing fingertips, though!

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by Jammur:
Not personification, interesting picture of a statue, would have worked for pride.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by AzCKelly:
Interesting picture. the sky is pretty blown though.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by inspir8tion:
Good perspective of this statue, but IMO it does not meet the challenge "Take a photo of something non-human-looking but yet still shows human characteristics or evokes a human feeling." This is definitely human looking.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by glad2badad:
It's a statue with human attributes...? Sorry, I was marking some images with a basic comment in case I didn't get back to them.

This image to me looks like a documentary type photo you might see in a college textbook on art. Technically it's ok. The overcast sky is a bit dull/uninteresting - can't always have blue skies. ;^) As for how this meets the challenge I still don't see it as I thought the subject was to be of a non-human looking inanimate object. This statue is very much human looking.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by monkeyfly:
Gray - very English.

QUEEN VICTORIA
by niro

Comment by dahkota:
For me, statues are imitation rather than personification. Interesting composition and POV.