Concrete and Steel
by courtenay27

Comment by MattW:
too close up, you can't really tell what the picture is..nice clarity though

Concrete and Steel
by courtenay27

Comment by pitsaman:
Can't tell if is bridge or pile of rusty steel!

Concrete and Steel
by courtenay27

Comment by Silver Fox:
You show some real colour of the steel and the rust and rot that takes place under a bridge, but would it have been possible to show this with more bridge showing at the same time? It just doesn't have much "wow" to it.

Concrete and Steel
by courtenay27

Comment by Swashbuckler:
Nice study of form and pattern. I'm sure this is a bridge, but there's no context to say "yes, it's a bridge". Focus seems perfect. Color - hard to say, but probably good. Framing - your choice. 5 Swash

Twin Towers
by courtenay27

Comment by courtenay27:
These identical buildings are Lincoln (l) and Morrill (r) Towers and they are administrative offices and honors residence halls on the Ohio State University camps in Columbus, Ohio. They were built in 1965 and have, since then, held the nickname of the "Twin Towers" because of the fact that they are identical 23 story buildings. The buildings are easily, perhaps instantly, recognizable by most or all people familiar with Columbus, Ohio State and Ohio in general and certainly anyone who has ever been to an OSU football game as the stadium is right next to Morrill Tower only about 100 yards away. More to the point of the challenge, this is my "corner of the world". I got my first degree from OSU and have worked there (in the tower) for the past 3 1/2 years. So, in response, I am not trying to be "smart-assed", just as a person from Manhattan who may have submitted a photo of something related to the World Trade Towers would not intend to be since they would see that as part of their world. Just as an aside I have a cousin who worked near the Trade Towers whose building was thankfully evacuated in time to avoid any fatalities that day. So I wonder if using my first title, "Twin Towers of OSU", would have been any different and avoided those comments. Probably not, but hey, it's just a photo. By the way, the towers don't look straight because of parallax. Look here for a definition: //www.dictionary.com/search?q=parallax&r=2
Courtenay

Twin Towers
by courtenay27

Comment by jpoole:
Nice.

Twin Towers
by courtenay27

Comment by thefinalcut:
Too bad about the people on the field, woud have worked out better without them. Still a good pic despite them though

Twin Towers
by courtenay27

Comment by cutelikeabunny:
not cool. Not cool at all.

Twin Towers
by courtenay27

Comment by ABC:
Your twin towers aren't straight and if you are trying to be smart-assed you haven't succeeded.

Twin Towers
by courtenay27

Comment by mullany1957:
Not by a long shot.