Time
by frate

Comment by Mousie:
Nice exposure, but the hands of the clock could be at a more intresting angle. :)

Time
by frate

Comment by drgsoell:
A bit closer would show off the relief around the clock face better.

Time
by frate

Comment by TampaDan:
Why not a shot of just the clock, without so much of the surrounding cabinet? I think it would have more visual impact.

Time
by frate

Comment by e301:
Some impression of the quality of these surfaces, though really quite an ordinary illustration of the clock face. Lacks that dynamic that comes from good lighting, from a less straightforward approach. Good exposure, and accurate colours and sense of the object itself, but the shot hasn't placed the emphasis on the textures really - would need more careful consideration of the affect of light on a surface in that area.

Time
by frate

Comment by blueswolf58:
Too much to look at. Get in closer and choose a main subject to focus on would really improve this shot. A famous photographer's theory was that if his pictures looked too static, it was because he wasn't close enough.

Time
by frate

Comment by tammy:
perhaps a tighter shot would have captured the textures better

Time
by frate

Comment by jpochard:
I like the textures on the clock and I think it's photographed well. Wish you'd have tightened the crop to leave out the hinged door.

Time
by frate

Comment by admart01:
I'd like to be closer to the clock face (your main subject, I assume) to get a better feel for the texture I sense is there

Time
by frate

Comment by geewhy:
Love the lighting in this image.
Good work

Time
by frate

Comment by KING:
[World Record Attempt]
+ Lovely wooden colours and great textures in this clock.
- Too much sharpening is noticable and distracting.