X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by dertyklobb:
Keep it regular when you've got so many shades of the same color.

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by seanc:
Sorry about yesterdays comment, it was a bad day. I tell you, my initial impression was to dq it, but i saw that it had been validated. I feel that it is seveerly overworked. Composition is fine and couldn't tell you on exposure, it looks like digital art not photography. Other than that it is not a still life.

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by Rooster:
unlike any of the other shots I've seen... very nice. How'd ya do it? I like that the background is in negative and the still life subject is not. One small suggestion might be if the bark was not in the centre but a bit to the left or right.

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by Artifacts:
I can't speak for others but reversed image, infrared and other radical color changes do not work well for me and that is true in this case. Live Geese are not a traditional still life subjects since they are animate. Cooked and displayed nicely on a platter, unfortunately, would be better a better still life subject.

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by Glen King:
Interesting, how did you do it?

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by mk:
Geese aren't still life and I'm not sure I see any benefit to solarizing the photo.

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by guobin:
the 'X-rayed' background doesn't really appeal to me
I understand that the tree trunk is the focus of your photo but it does not really look appealing....

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by Neuferland:
Oooo, what to say, what to say. This is an interesting shot to say the least. If you had gone for just the tree I think it might have worked better. The post processing has made the picture noisy and distracting, the huge trunk in the middle looks totally out of place, maybe if you had cropped it so the tree completely cut the shot in half? Or came from a different angle? A 4

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by TooCool:
Psychedelic, but Not still life.
TC

X-Ray Geese
by flauri

Comment by alanfreed:
I'm not sure what value the effect adds to the shot. I know it's tempting to use various features like this, but there should be a good reason to do so.