100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by dtremain:
Good picture. For me, this is a large stretch for this challenge because the purple streaks back from the eyes show a very short time span of popularity, rather than an enduring look of classic beauty.

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by hipsterdoofus52:
I Have to admit, the beautiful eyes of the model caught my eye more than the rose.Beautiful color

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by curtpetguy:
She looks good for her age.

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by Tiny:
Its a nice shot but not really sure about meeting the challenge ?

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by JustCaree:
shes not a hundred, and that flower is in immaculate shape if its 100 years old.... hmmm the image doesnt feel old either.... not voting yet.... gonna think.

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by bohemka:
Nice portrait. The tones are well tied together and the processing is excellent. Very nice how the sharpness smoothes out by the time we get to her collarbone. Keeps your focus on her eyes and the rose. I'd wager, however, that most voters will not be able to make the connection with the challenge theme. Not voting, just commenting.

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by Yo_Spiff:
Not getting it. Is the dried flower 100 years old? I'll have to give the benefit of the doubt on this one, even though the connection is not totally clear to me.

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by expatdawn:
How does this represent 100 years?

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by lawrysimm:
Lovely shot and model.... neither of the items in your shot are at least 100 years old though (unless you're talking at a subatomic level) so I'm knocking points off for my perceived DNMC.

100 Years Later
by jdevera

Comment by Qiki:
This is a real stretch.