3.66% - DPChallenge Forums

02/15/2010 01:37:44 AM · #1

That's how many of the members are active at the moment :(

Even allowing for those that just aren't around DPC anymore that is a shocking statistic. Who hasn't done a critique in a long while - how about popping in and doing one - just one?

bspurgeon

Fujifilm x100

Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

02/15/2010 02:21:06 AM · #2

Will do...

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

02/15/2010 08:47:58 PM · #3

Originally posted by bspurgeon:

Will do...

That's the spirit - anybody else?

snaffles

Nikon D7100

02/15/2010 08:50:23 PM · #4

Ain't nuthin on TV but the Olympics and there's always replays if a Canuckistanian ribbons, so I'll do a couple more...

JulietNN

Tamron 16-300mm Di II VC PZD MACRO w/Canon Nikon mount

02/15/2010 09:15:32 PM · #5

ok fine will do

zeuszen

Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

02/15/2010 09:17:18 PM · #6

Originally posted by Nuzzer:

... Who hasn't done a critique in a long while - how about popping in and doing one - just one?

A critique, about 30 mins...
A good one about an hour plus.
The image better be worth it.

Dr.Confuser

Nikon D800

02/15/2010 09:28:13 PM · #7

Originally posted by Nuzzer:

I'm a nut about data and statistics. In fact I know that 47% of all statistics are made up on the spot. I'm wondering if this one is made up, or true. Can you let us know what comprised the numerator and denominator yielding 3.66%, please. It just seems like too small a percentage.

snaffles

Nikon D7100

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

02/15/2010 09:33:31 PM · #8

I just did three, so there should only be about 6 left now.

Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical IF for Canon

02/15/2010 09:38:21 PM · #9

Originally posted by Dr.Confuser:

Originally posted by Nuzzer:
That's how many of the members are active at the moment :(

Even allowing for those that just aren't around DPC anymore that is a shocking statistic. Who hasn't done a critique in a long while - how about popping in and doing one - just one?

I'm a nut about data and statistics. In fact I know that 47% of all statistics are made up on the spot. I'm wondering if this one is made up, or true. Can you let us know what comprised the numerator and denominator yielding 3.66%, please. It just seems like too small a percentage.

Sure, at the time there had been 14 members active in the last 2 weeks out of a total CC membership of 382.

So, gonna do a critique now?

SDW

Canon EOS-60D

02/15/2010 10:19:13 PM · #10

Originally posted by Nuzzer:

Sure, at the time there had been 14 members active in the last 2 weeks out of a total CC membership of 382.

So, gonna do a critique now?

I wish I could do an honest critique at this time but I have not taken a photograph in about a year because at the moment I don't have a camera. Critiquing a photograph goes beyond the technical into the artisty and what type of editing is popular at the time on the site. One should take all of those areas into account while critiquing an image. So for now I feel would do the photograph more harm than good.

I'm one of the 368 that has not critiqued in the last two weeks and the above is why.

Maybe I'm right, maybe I'm wrong but this is how I feel.

Quigley

Nikon D700

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

02/15/2010 11:15:50 PM · #11

Originally posted by zeuszen:

Originally posted by Nuzzer:
... Who hasn't done a critique in a long while - how about popping in and doing one - just one?

A critique, about 30 mins...
A good one about an hour plus.
The image better be worth it.

All images are worth the time it takes to offer a critique, this is how one helps others better themselves. I personally have appreciated each and everyone that I have ever received. Good or bad, insight into how others see your work is a valuable tool for improvement and can only serve to better ones self.

A hearty good cheer to those of you who have the time and energy to help others with your knowledge. Thank you one and all for your wonderful work with image critiques.

MAX!

sfalice

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

02/15/2010 11:35:10 PM · #12

Originally posted by Dr.Confuser:

I can't tell you what

nuzzer used, but here are the exact statistics that I posted to another thread on 2/13:

Here are the statistics on the Critique Club activity since the group was established (apparently at about the same time the site was established)
these stats are as of a few minutes ago:
Since its inception
76,580 have been requested
15,028 have been critiqued
by a total of 382 volunteer (and vetted) members.
Within the last two weeks, 14 critique club members have been active.

At the present time we get about 80 or so requests each week.

I'm rotten at math, but if you like statistics, here they are. Help yourself and crunch numbers!
(I would not only crunch them, I would step on them first!=.)
:-))