| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/14/2006 10:45:14 AM · #1 |
A commercial photographer with some great skills.
If you need a smile today, find the kid with the wet cat.
Mark Tucker Photography
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 11:00:11 AM · #2 |
That's quite an imressive portfolio. It seemed to me as if there were some weird things going on for what concerns DOF. Have a look at the portrait of the man in the pool - has that photograph really got two points of focus (face & wall in the back)?
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 11:04:17 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by gloda:
That's quite an imressive portfolio. It seemed to me as if there were some weird things going on for what concerns DOF. Have a look at the portrait of the man in the pool - has that photograph really got two points of focus (face & wall in the back)? |
There is no doubt about it. It is a "look".
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 11:17:33 AM · #4 |
Inspiring portfolio, thanks for posting it.
Bill |
|
|
|
10/14/2006 11:24:14 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Cutter:
There is no doubt about it. It is a "look". |
What do you mean by that? I had the impression that the DOF might be artificial.
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 11:31:48 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by gloda:
Originally posted by Cutter:
There is no doubt about it. It is a "look". |
What do you mean by that? I had the impression that the DOF might be artificial. |
It feels like selective blurring to me in places as well.
Nicely done though.
Great range.
I really like the processing on the Salton Sea stuff.
Nostalgic.
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 12:31:49 PM · #7 |
I'm a big fan of Mark's work. Here is a shot of his Plungercam. Long before lensbabies were born :) Plungercam
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 12:46:42 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by gloda:
Originally posted by Cutter:
There is no doubt about it. It is a "look". |
What do you mean by that? I had the impression that the DOF might be artificial. |
Definitely artificial....I was basically agreeing that something "funky" is going on...either with a lens modifier or in post.
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 12:56:33 PM · #9 |
I'd be interested to find out how you could possibly achieve such an effect with a 'lens modifier'. I'd have thought it was physically impossible. Can anyone fill me in on this? (Kirbic? :)
|
|
|
|
10/14/2006 01:53:59 PM · #10 |
| He certainly has some talent. Nice link. What's more, he manages to do with a plain and simple HTML site what many fail to do with Flash and all sorts of bells and whistles. Steiner's photography is better exhibited on his web site than most. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/23/2024 02:41:49 PM EDT.
