Author | Thread |
|
02/05/2010 04:23:25 PM · #101 |
It's semitransparent now, sorry, I was messing with some code and overwrote the photo with no background transparency. |
|
|
02/05/2010 11:07:21 PM · #102 |
Originally posted by langdon: It's semitransparent now, sorry, I was messing with some code and overwrote the photo with no background transparency. |
Ohhh, I see. I must've looked at it in those 3 minutes. It's very nice right now. Maybe a DPC logo right before the text? Or would that be too much DPC branding and not enough member branding? |
|
|
02/06/2010 08:55:32 AM · #103 |
|
|
02/06/2010 12:02:38 PM · #104 |
Looks good langdon :)
Nice work, to you and the SC. |
|
|
02/06/2010 01:55:18 PM · #105 |
I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images.
|
|
|
02/06/2010 02:10:31 PM · #106 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle: I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images. |
Ditto. |
|
|
02/06/2010 02:11:34 PM · #107 |
Cool stuff. On that test image link I was able to download the image with or without a watermark. I presume this will be a member only feature, non-members won't be able to click to view without watermark.
I like it, well done. |
|
|
02/06/2010 02:49:21 PM · #108 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle: I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images. |
Me also. |
|
|
02/07/2010 12:01:38 AM · #109 |
I am guessing that this will be in a transparent layer at some point to prevent downloading...
I guess it will still allow "print-screen, Paste" type copying, and I think that's fine - particularly if it is for members.
I will probably never use it, but I still think it's a fantastic implementation of the idea.
Someone get Langdon an OOBIE! |
|
|
02/07/2010 04:18:44 AM · #110 |
Originally posted by eschelar: I guess it will still allow "print-screen, Paste" type copying, and I think that's fine - particularly if it is for members. |
How do you think you can stop anyone from hitting printscreen?
|
|
|
02/07/2010 09:08:40 AM · #111 |
I second the exact sentiments.
Originally posted by ClubJuggle: I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images. |
|
|
|
02/07/2010 01:42:26 PM · #112 |
Originally posted by eschelar: I am guessing that this will be in a transparent layer at some point to prevent downloading... |
I was told it will not be an overlay, but a display of the modified image file, to prevent both right-click downloads and print-screen copying. I don't know if there will be a way to see the un-modified image once the watermark's been applied unless the photographer chooses to remove it. |
|
|
02/07/2010 04:39:54 PM · #113 |
Thanks, Langdon. Good work. |
|
|
02/07/2010 07:25:55 PM · #114 |
Will there be an option for color in the watermark? The current example wouldn't show up well on challenges such as light on white or other images where there is a large amount of white space. |
|
|
02/07/2010 11:18:43 PM · #115 |
It looks like for now there will be a choice of black or white, with a couple of levels for each. |
|
|
02/08/2010 11:41:07 PM · #116 |
Originally posted by Azrifel: Originally posted by eschelar: I guess it will still allow "print-screen, Paste" type copying, and I think that's fine - particularly if it is for members. |
How do you think you can stop anyone from hitting printscreen? |
I was referring to the ability to toggle the watermark.
I the watermark is not toggle-able, it must always be dealt with if the person wants to rip it.
Still, if the toggle function is limited to paying users, that's probably going to accomplish its goal. |
|
|
02/09/2010 09:29:05 AM · #117 |
The toggle will not be available on the final product.
Originally posted by langdon: If you click the image, it will toggle between the watermarked and non-watermarked option. I did this to make sure that quality was preserved. |
|
|
|
02/09/2010 05:26:49 PM · #118 |
Great. Now that this is almost done, can we have darker backgrounds to view our pics? Please. :D |
|
|
02/09/2010 05:49:55 PM · #119 |
Originally posted by langdon: The toggle will not be available on the final product. |
Whew! good to hear. :) |
|
|
02/09/2010 11:22:39 PM · #120 |
Very cool and done tastefully. Great job! Thanks Langdon. |
|
|
02/10/2010 02:04:30 AM · #121 |
I think it's perfect. I like the transparent nature and how professional it looks.
Thank you Langdon. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 08:38:51 AM EDT.