Author | Thread |
|
06/03/2015 11:12:57 AM · #1 |
Thought it was a neat story and a nicely shot picture in the moment from a moving vehicle.
Tower Bridge wedding shot |
|
|
06/03/2015 02:46:59 PM · #2 |
I read one of the comments and I kind of agree with it. I think this was a publicity stunt by the photographer. Or else he entirely missed the actual photographer because there clearly is one by the shadow in the image. |
|
|
06/03/2015 02:49:20 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by sjhuls: I read one of the comments and I kind of agree with it. I think this was a publicity stunt by the photographer. Or else he entirely missed the actual photographer because there clearly is one by the shadow in the image. |
Agreed. He can't be so dumb as to not see the shadow of the photographer. |
|
|
06/03/2015 03:01:31 PM · #4 |
It's just a photo a guy took from his car and he liked it so much he wanted the couple to have it. It's obvious there was a professional photographer for the couple, but so what?
The internet has made this sort of search a fun scavenger hunt that unites the globe in a positive way. I love it. It's along the lines of Brother Orange. |
|
|
06/03/2015 03:02:04 PM · #5 |
Is this what they call "investigative reporting" now? ... so sad. "Hey I shot a photo of a couple posing for another photographer!" LOL |
|
|
06/03/2015 03:05:24 PM · #6 |
The other photographer (the shadow) clearly missed a perfect shot from a bad case of chimping...
Sad day for him... Lol. |
|
|
06/03/2015 03:08:19 PM · #7 |
Yeah I'm sure he/she only got about 600 photos that look better than that =D
Originally posted by mbrutus2009: The other photographer (the shadow) clearly missed a perfect shot from a bad case of chimping...
Sad day for him... Lol. |
|
|
|
06/03/2015 03:47:19 PM · #8 |
Unless the shadow is a guy eating a hot dog.
He might at least have straightened it for them, sheesh. |
|
|
06/03/2015 03:55:25 PM · #9 |
I dunno. That seems a bit cynical. Why would a London photog choose to go "viral" with a Canadian Facebooker and what would he gain without his/her name being included? Also, the shadow could be a photographer, but it could be a tourist or even someone without a camera. I don't think it was someone taking an active photograph unless they are doing something weird by holding the camera at chest height.
I'll just take the story at face value. |
|
|
06/03/2015 08:22:38 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by tate: Yeah I'm sure he/she only got about 600 photos that look better than that =D |
Given that the only information we have on the official photographer is a chimping shadow and that he is probably shooting on the side that puts the Shard tower in the background, I would bet on well under 600 ;) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/25/2024 08:12:05 AM EDT.