DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Current Challenge >> All the leading scores are posted here.
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 25 of 51, (reverse)
AuthorThread
04/10/2015 12:18:34 AM · #1
I'm afraid to look.
04/10/2015 12:28:31 AM · #2
No views yet.
04/10/2015 12:35:52 AM · #3
Nothing leading no where
04/10/2015 12:39:48 AM · #4
2 views, no votes
04/10/2015 12:52:17 AM · #5
How very odd. I also have views and no votes...
04/10/2015 12:59:19 AM · #6
Nada.

Somebody has votes since I voted on about 25%.
04/10/2015 01:19:48 AM · #7
6 @ 3 votes
04/10/2015 01:44:57 AM · #8
Votes: 3
Views: 9
Avg Vote: 6.6667
Comments: 0

how come nobody has votes???

Votes: 5
Views: 15
Avg Vote: 5.8000
Comments: 0


Message edited by author 2015-04-10 04:34:09.
04/10/2015 02:02:27 AM · #9
I've got 2 votes

Votes: 2
Views: 6
Avg Vote:5.0000
Comments:0
04/10/2015 03:28:35 AM · #10
I think I preferred it when I had no votes.... At least I had Hope to hold on to!

:-)
04/10/2015 03:46:30 AM · #11
Originally posted by Tiberius:

6 @ 3 votes

7 @ 5 :-)
04/10/2015 07:39:03 AM · #12
Votes: 5
Views: 16
Avg Vote: 4.4000

I will be asking for critiques on mine if the votes continue like this, it could possibly be just the way it was processed too but I am not sure. I thought it fit the challenge perfectly in more than one way.. wasn't gonna wait around for the first vote to happen LOL, ppft not to happy about this one. Or people just do not understand what leading lines mean at all. This was one challenge I thought I was actually familiar with that had to do with photography and was excited about :-D

Message edited by author 2015-04-10 07:49:59.
04/10/2015 07:51:41 AM · #13
I thought I had a rather good interpretation of the challenge with a decent photo.. the voters disagree 5.5
04/10/2015 08:12:23 AM · #14
4.4?? I've been here long enough to know this is not that bad. Judging from the other posts here, I think there were just a handful of harsh overnight voters. Perhaps. It could actually suck.
04/10/2015 08:13:49 AM · #15
Originally posted by jgirl57:

Votes: 5
Views: 16
Avg Vote: 4.4000

I will be asking for critiques on mine if the votes continue like this, it could possibly be just the way it was processed too but I am not sure. I thought it fit the challenge perfectly in more than one way.. wasn't gonna wait around for the first vote to happen LOL, ppft not to happy about this one. Or people just do not understand what leading lines mean at all. This was one challenge I thought I was actually familiar with that had to do with photography and was excited about :-D


Same here

Votes 5
Views 21
Avg vote 4.4000. I thought I at least met the challenge. 4.4000? Come on, it's not that bad!
04/10/2015 08:29:31 AM · #16
Well... looks like the first handful of voters agreed with my interpretation

Votes: 5
Views: 26
Avg Vote: 6.4000
Comments: 0

And I didn't see too many I disagreed with when I was voting

You have rated 77 of 77 images (100%) in this challenge.
You have given an average score of 5.9740.
04/10/2015 09:23:12 AM · #17
Jgirl and Jomari - I'll race you to the brown :-)

I knew mine wasn't a 'traditional' shot of a disappearing road, and therefore at risk, but I did actually look up a few definitions and examples to check I wasn't completely off the mark. I'd be interested to know if I'm being voted down for perceived DNMC, meeting the challenge but badly, or just dreadful photography!

I do actually mean that - I can live with comments on any of these points of view whether during or after the challenge - and I won't answer back, I promise :-)
04/10/2015 09:46:49 AM · #18
4.625 - and yet I love my shot. (Although it definitely wasn't leading lines in any normal sense - but I wasn't sure if that traditional definition was the only acceptable definition or not.)

04/10/2015 09:51:11 AM · #19
Originally posted by Jules1x:

4.625 - and yet I love my shot. (Although it definitely wasn't leading lines in any normal sense - but I wasn't sure if that traditional definition was the only acceptable definition or not.)


That's the problem here, you never know how the voters will define a challenge.
04/10/2015 09:52:55 AM · #20
Little lower then I expected, but I knew going in that my photo did not follow a traditional leading line definition.

Votes: 7
Views: 24
Avg Vote: 5.7143
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
04/10/2015 10:13:42 AM · #21
I've only looked at about 1/3 of the entries. I could find a leading line in all though some were stronger than others. Problem was, there weren't many "good" (IMO, of course) photos among them. My definition of good would include interesting, well taken and processed, eliciting emotion, making me linger and/or calling me back and not necessarily all of these in the same shot. Maybe that's why so many low scores. Oh, and I definitely count my entry among these - it's uninteresting, the antitheses of emotionally moving and engaging, and not particularly well done technically. I just made it up to a 5 and, frankly, that's about what it deserves. Early days yet, though. Plenty of time to go up . . . or down.
04/10/2015 10:15:52 AM · #22
Disappointing and this is it at its peak so far

Votes: 12
Views: 25
Avg Vote: 5.0000
Comments: 0
04/10/2015 12:12:35 PM · #23
I've dropped a full 1.0000 point in the last 11 votes - I don't like where that leading line is headed
04/10/2015 12:26:19 PM · #24
Originally posted by vlado:

I've dropped a full 1.0000 point in the last 11 votes - I don't like where that leading line is headed

Mine is on generally the same sorry trajectory. I am just hoping things level off soon.
04/10/2015 12:34:27 PM · #25
Votes: 12
Views: 30
Avg Vote: 4.8333
Comments: 0
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 11/18/2017 11:45:09 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2017 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Proudly hosted by Sargasso Networks. Current Server Time: 11/18/2017 11:45:09 PM EST.