| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/10/2010 02:04:30 AM · #1 |
I think it's perfect. I like the transparent nature and how professional it looks.
Thank you Langdon. |
|
|
|
02/09/2010 11:22:39 PM · #2 |
| Very cool and done tastefully. Great job! Thanks Langdon. |
|
|
|
02/09/2010 05:49:55 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by langdon:
The toggle will not be available on the final product. |
Whew! good to hear. :) |
|
|
|
02/09/2010 05:26:49 PM · #4 |
| Great. Now that this is almost done, can we have darker backgrounds to view our pics? Please. :D |
|
|
|
02/09/2010 09:29:05 AM · #5 |
The toggle will not be available on the final product.
Originally posted by langdon:
If you click the image, it will toggle between the watermarked and non-watermarked option. I did this to make sure that quality was preserved. |
|
|
|
|
02/08/2010 11:41:07 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by Azrifel:
Originally posted by eschelar:
I guess it will still allow "print-screen, Paste" type copying, and I think that's fine - particularly if it is for members. |
How do you think you can stop anyone from hitting printscreen? |
I was referring to the ability to toggle the watermark.
I the watermark is not toggle-able, it must always be dealt with if the person wants to rip it.
Still, if the toggle function is limited to paying users, that's probably going to accomplish its goal. |
|
|
|
02/07/2010 11:18:43 PM · #7 |
| It looks like for now there will be a choice of black or white, with a couple of levels for each. |
|
|
|
02/07/2010 07:25:55 PM · #8 |
| Will there be an option for color in the watermark? The current example wouldn't show up well on challenges such as light on white or other images where there is a large amount of white space. |
|
|
|
02/07/2010 04:39:54 PM · #9 |
| Thanks, Langdon. Good work. |
|
|
|
02/07/2010 01:42:26 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by eschelar:
I am guessing that this will be in a transparent layer at some point to prevent downloading... |
I was told it will not be an overlay, but a display of the modified image file, to prevent both right-click downloads and print-screen copying. I don't know if there will be a way to see the un-modified image once the watermark's been applied unless the photographer chooses to remove it. |
|
|
|
02/07/2010 09:08:40 AM · #11 |
I second the exact sentiments.
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images. |
|
|
|
|
02/07/2010 04:18:44 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by eschelar:
I guess it will still allow "print-screen, Paste" type copying, and I think that's fine - particularly if it is for members. |
How do you think you can stop anyone from hitting printscreen?
|
|
|
|
02/07/2010 12:01:38 AM · #13 |
I am guessing that this will be in a transparent layer at some point to prevent downloading...
I guess it will still allow "print-screen, Paste" type copying, and I think that's fine - particularly if it is for members.
I will probably never use it, but I still think it's a fantastic implementation of the idea.
Someone get Langdon an OOBIE! |
|
|
|
02/06/2010 02:49:21 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images. |
Me also. |
|
|
|
02/06/2010 02:11:34 PM · #15 |
Cool stuff. On that test image link I was able to download the image with or without a watermark. I presume this will be a member only feature, non-members won't be able to click to view without watermark.
I like it, well done. |
|
|
|
02/06/2010 02:10:31 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by ClubJuggle:
I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images. |
Ditto. |
|
|
|
02/06/2010 01:55:18 PM · #17 |
I was completely opposed to watermarks before, but seeing the posted example changed my mind. This is tasteful and well-done and I think it will be a major benefit to help those who choose to use it protect their images.
|
|
|
|
02/06/2010 12:02:38 PM · #18 |
Looks good langdon :)
Nice work, to you and the SC. |
|
|
|
02/06/2010 08:55:32 AM · #19 |
|
|
|
02/05/2010 11:07:21 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by langdon:
It's semitransparent now, sorry, I was messing with some code and overwrote the photo with no background transparency. |
Ohhh, I see. I must've looked at it in those 3 minutes. It's very nice right now. Maybe a DPC logo right before the text? Or would that be too much DPC branding and not enough member branding? |
|
|
|
02/05/2010 04:23:25 PM · #21 |
| It's semitransparent now, sorry, I was messing with some code and overwrote the photo with no background transparency. |
|
|
|
02/05/2010 04:11:40 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by TrollMan:
Originally posted by george917:
It's not semitransparent? :( |
It is for me... |
looks like its transparent to me too... |
|
|
|
02/05/2010 03:55:31 PM · #23 |
Originally posted by george917:
It's not semitransparent? :( |
It is for me... |
|
|
|
02/05/2010 03:28:57 PM · #24 |
| It's not semitransparent? :( |
|
|
|
02/05/2010 12:36:44 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by langdon:
Haha, oops! It looks like IE6 was doing the right thing by displaying the red X. I put three forward slashes in my link (///). Fixed.
Originally posted by BeefnCheez:
i really like this and I'm glad you are moving forward. However I have some issues with the actual watermark, namely the placement. I think putting it in any of the corners is quite silly if someone is indeed trying to protect a photo. The center is thus the only option and this to me is too limiting. I would like to see a midpoint between the corners and the center as an option on all four sides. This way it cannot be cropped out and yet isn't slapping you across the face. Just my opinion. |
I will likely go the extra mile and add padding options, if not direct placement of the watermark. |
I agree with Beef about placement...if we can adjust that, then this is simply awesome! Thank you very much for addressing this very controversial issue. I am looking forward to this being a reality in the next few weeks so I can get back to fully participating in this great site!
Message edited by author 2010-02-05 12:39:01. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/17/2024 10:29:54 PM EDT.
